My rating: 3 of 5 stars
The Woman in the Library, by author Sulari Gentill, is like no other book I’ve ever read. The risks Gentill takes in turning the traditional structure of a murder mystery on its ear are at once intriguing and frustrating; the source of not only the book’s strengths but also it’s weaknesses.
The chapters in the book are the work of fictional author Hannah Tigone. She is an Australian writer using a beta reader in the US, Leo Johnson, to help her stay true to the setting she has chosen in the US. The book initially alternates between the story Hannah Tigone is writing (a piece set in Boston, the premise of which is a writer developing a murder mystery) and the letters she then receives from her beta reader as she shares with him each chapter upon its completion. In Leo’s letters to Tigone, he corrects some of her Australian word choices to more appropriate American phrasing and suggests adjustments of details based on the area of Boston where the story is set. Leo is himself a writer, though he has not enjoyed the successes of Tigone, and he doesn’t hesitate to boldly assert himself in proposing tweaks and changes, some minor and some which could potentially alter the entire plot of Tigone’s work. His letters become increasingly aggressive in their suggestions as the story progresses; his recommendations more violent and graphic. The reader is not, however, given any insight into Tigone’s reactions beyond what Leo responds to and a few other communications directed to Tigone that are included (to elaborate on this point would mean spoilers, which I am loathe to include). If it sounds confusing, that’s because it is. While the “story within a story” has certainly been done before, the structure of The Woman in the Library takes it one step further, testing both the loyalty and patience of the reader. If the reader doesn’t immediately catch on to what Gentill is trying to do, the result is seemingly unrelated chapters that refuse to connect. The upshot is that this is a novel that contains chapters of another novel, written by a fictional author, the content of which is the story of a mystery writer awarded a grant that allows her to travel to the US from Australia in order to write her book. Those chapters alternate with letters from the fictional author’s beta reader. Yeah. It’s quite a monumental task for both author and reader.
I appreciate the risks Gentill takes in her storytelling. They keep the reader focused, if only to stay on top of the ever-changing perspective and media being shared. The transitions between Leo’s letters and suggestions and the mystery being written by the fictional author are sometimes awkward and abrupt. While this may have been intentional, for me it removed me from the story in an effort to “keep up”. Further more, Gentill’s approach to character development (there was none for Tigone) made the entire book feel distant, as if I as the reader was being held at an arm’s length instead of being invited in to meet the cast. This feeling of being an outsider colored my ability to invest in either Leo’s spiraling mental state or the story Tigone is writing. Even the characters within the mystery are under developed and almost ethereal—shallow and transparent to the point of appearing as rough outlines of who they could have become under the direction of a more experienced writer.
I appear to be in the minority with my rating, as others have placed this squarely in the 5 star category. For me, however, I could offer only three stars for the novel approach. Beyond that, there is definitely a lack of substance from the beginning that never does materialize.
Thanks to NetGalley and Poisoned Pen Press for allowing me access to this ARC. Expected publication is slated for June 7, 2022.